National Labor Relations Board v. Provincial House, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Provincial House, Inc.

445 F.2d 297, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2734, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9194

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1971

Docket20988_1

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 297 (National Labor Relations Board v. Provincial House, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Provincial House, Inc., 445 F.2d 297, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2734, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9194 (6th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order against the respondent, Provincial House, Inc. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 45. The single issue involved is whether the Board correctly found that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (5) of the Act by its . admitted refusal to bargain with the *298 duly certified representative of the nonprofessional employees of its nursing home in Hastings, Michigan. The Company based its refusal to bargain on the grounds that the certification of the Union in the underlying representation proceeding was invalid.

We have considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and conclude that the Board properly found that the admitted refusal of the Company to bargain with the Union was a violation of the Act and that the order of the Board should be enforced.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order against the respondent, Provincial House, Inc. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 45. The single issue involved is whether the Board correctly found that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (5) of the Act by its . admitted refusal to bargain with the *298 duly certified representative of the nonprofessional employees of its nursing home in Hastings, Michigan. The Company based its refusal to bargain on the grounds that the certification of the Union in the underlying representation proceeding was invalid.

We have considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and conclude that the Board properly found that the admitted refusal of the Company to bargain with the Union was a violation of the Act and that the order of the Board should be enforced.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 297, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2734, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-provincial-house-inc-ca6-1971.