National Labor Relations Board v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Co.

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Co.

443 F.2d 1369, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3081, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8845

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1971

DocketNos. 71-1049, 71-1096

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 443 F.2d 1369 (National Labor Relations Board v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Co., 443 F.2d 1369, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3081, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8845 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Judge Ely would enforce the board’s order on the basis of the board’s opinion reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 135.

Judge Chambers is of the view that the board is right except he believes it would not serve the purposes of the act to require the payment at this time of 1968 Christmas bonuses in the neighborhood of two thousand dollars in all.

Judge Taylor agrees with the minority board opinion that the issue should have been arbitrated.

There being two votes that the issue was not required to be arbitrated, Judges Chambers and Taylor vote to enforce the board’s order except they vote to strike the provision for the payment now of the 1968 bonus.

All are in agreement that the bringing of a case such as this is an imposition on the board and the courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Judge Ely would enforce the board’s order on the basis of the board’s opinion reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 135.

Judge Chambers is of the view that the board is right except he believes it would not serve the purposes of the act to require the payment at this time of 1968 Christmas bonuses in the neighborhood of two thousand dollars in all.

Judge Taylor agrees with the minority board opinion that the issue should have been arbitrated.

There being two votes that the issue was not required to be arbitrated, Judges Chambers and Taylor vote to enforce the board’s order except they vote to strike the provision for the payment now of the 1968 bonus.

All are in agreement that the bringing of a case such as this is an imposition on the board and the courts.

National Labor Relations Board, and Los Angeles Newspaper Web Pressmen's Union No. 18, International Printing Pressmen & Assistants Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Company, D/B/A Pomona Progress Bulletin, Progress Bulletin Publishing Company, D/B/A Pomona Progress Bulletin v. National Labor Relations Board

443 F.2d 1369 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 1369, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3081, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-progress-bulletin-publishing-co-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack