National Labor Relations Board v. Production Plated Plastics, Inc.

663 F.2d 709, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1981
Docket80-1290
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 663 F.2d 709 (National Labor Relations Board v. Production Plated Plastics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Production Plated Plastics, Inc., 663 F.2d 709, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16194 (6th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board directing Production Plastics, Incorporated to bargain collectively with intervenor Union, to reinstate with backpay certain discharged employees and to cease and desist certain practices that the Board found unfair, including the company’s decision to deny its employees a Christmas bonus after the union had won the election. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 247 NLRB No. 76 (1980).

Upon a consideration of the record as a whole, the court is of the opinion that, contrary to the assertion of respondent, there was not sufficient evidence presented to the Board to have required the holding of a hearing. See NLRB v. Tennessee Packers, 379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 958, 88 S.Ct. 338, 19 L.Ed.2d 364 (1967).

It was also asserted that two employees acted as agents of the Union while making threats to fellow employees during the union representation campaign. Irrespective of whether those employees were *710 agents, the limited nature of their conduct, the subsequent apologies by the employees, the absence of any violence in the campaign and the sizable union majority in the election all provided overwhelming evidence that nothing which happened could have destroyed the laboratory conditions for the election. The court is further of the opinion that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Board in all other respects. Accordingly,

The order of the Board is enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
663 F.2d 709, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-production-plated-plastics-inc-ca6-1981.