National Labor Relations Board v. Pine Products Corporation
This text of 361 F.2d 480 (National Labor Relations Board v. Pine Products Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The National Labor Relations Board has found that respondent violated section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National 61 Stat. 140, as amended, 73 Stat. 525 (1959), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3), (1) (1964), by discharging Floyd Manley Mergel because of union activities. It seeks enforcement of its order. Respondent here attacks the credibility determinations of the Trial Examiner and his choice of inferences. It persuasively argues that the discharge of Mergel was for legitimate business purposes and pursuant to legitimate managerial decisions.
On review the sole question is whether the Board’s findings are sup *481 ported by substantial evidence on the whole record. We conclude that they are and that the order is entitled to enforcement.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 480, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2388, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-pine-products-corporation-ca9-1966.