National Labor Relations Board v. New Fern Restorium Company

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. New Fern Restorium Company

438 F.2d 1026, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11756

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 19, 1971

Docket30325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 F.2d 1026 (National Labor Relations Board v. New Fern Restorium Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. New Fern Restorium Company, 438 F.2d 1026, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11756 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Enforced. See Local Rule 21. 1

Enforced.

1

. Local Rule 21.

When the court determines that any one or more of the following circumstances exists and is dispositive of a matter submitted to the court for decision : (1) that a judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous; (2) that the evidence in support of a jury verdict is not insufficient; (3) that the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (4) that no error of law appears; and the court also determines that an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Enforced. See Local Rule 21. 1

Enforced.

1

. Local Rule 21.

When the court determines that any one or more of the following circumstances exists and is dispositive of a matter submitted to the court for decision : (1) that a judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous; (2) that the evidence in support of a jury verdict is not insufficient; (3) that the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (4) that no error of law appears; and the court also determines that an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 1026, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2623, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-new-fern-restorium-company-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack