National Labor Relations Board v. National Federation of Labor, Inc.

387 F.2d 352, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4030
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 1967
Docket24466_1
StatusPublished

This text of 387 F.2d 352 (National Labor Relations Board v. National Federation of Labor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. National Federation of Labor, Inc., 387 F.2d 352, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4030 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After an extended hearing reflected by a record which even in the abbreviated form of a joint appendix exceeds one thousand pages the Board, finding that NFL 1 was the successor of USEA 2 determined, 160 NLRB No. 63, that NFL had violated § 8(b)(1)(A), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b)(1)(A), by executing collective-bargaining agreements with various employers at a time when NFL was an employer-dominated labor organization and did not represent an uncoerced majority of employees. The Board also found that NFL violated § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b)(1)(A) and (2) by executing contracts which contain clauses providing for preferential hiring of NFL members. Although in response to the Board’s petition for enforcement, § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), NFL filed a formal opposition, it has since neither filed a brief nor appeared through counsel on the submission. But giving such independent review to the record as our limited role permits we find not a significant legal issue presented and more than ample evidence upon which to reach the factual and legal conclusions in the Board’s order.

Enforced.

1

. National Federation of Labor, Inc.

2

. United Southern Employees Association. As a result of hearings in August, 1960, the parties entered into a stipulation consenting to disestablishment of USEA as a labor organization and requiring it to cease and desist from engaging in employer-dominated activities, maintaining agreements with employers, and restraining employees. The Board entered an order on January 12, 1961, encompassing the terms of the stipulation. This order was enforced by decree of this Court on April 10, 1961.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 F.2d 352, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-national-federation-of-labor-inc-ca5-1967.