National Labor Relations Board v. Nashua Pre-Cast Corporation

First Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Nashua Pre-Cast Corporation

475 F.2d 765, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2896, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11057

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 1973

Docket72-1339

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 475 F.2d 765 (National Labor Relations Board v. Nashua Pre-Cast Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Nashua Pre-Cast Corporation, 475 F.2d 765, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2896, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11057 (1st Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The basic question presented on this petition for enforcement is whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. Without in any way departing from our rule that the burden of producing evidence, as distinguished from speculation, is on the Board, e. g., NLRB v. Millard Metal Service Center, Inc., 1 Cir., 1973, 472 F.2d 647; Cross Baking Co. v. NLRB, 1 Cir., 1971, 453 F.2d 1346, respondent’s criticism of the Board’s decision, 198 N.L.R.B. No. 30 (1972), cannot be viewed as of that nature. Respondent’s over-extensive briefing recites evidence which might have warranted a different result, but it does not require us to reject the evidence on which the Board relied, or the inferences it reasonably drew therefrom.

The order will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The basic question presented on this petition for enforcement is whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. Without in any way departing from our rule that the burden of producing evidence, as distinguished from speculation, is on the Board, e. g., NLRB v. Millard Metal Service Center, Inc., 1 Cir., 1973, 472 F.2d 647; Cross Baking Co. v. NLRB, 1 Cir., 1971, 453 F.2d 1346, respondent’s criticism of the Board’s decision, 198 N.L.R.B. No. 30 (1972), cannot be viewed as of that nature. Respondent’s over-extensive briefing recites evidence which might have warranted a different result, but it does not require us to reject the evidence on which the Board relied, or the inferences it reasonably drew therefrom.

The order will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F.2d 765, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2896, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-nashua-pre-cast-corporation-ca1-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack