National Labor Relations Board v. Myca Products Division of the Kane Company

352 F.2d 511, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3980
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1965
Docket16203
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 352 F.2d 511 (National Labor Relations Board v. Myca Products Division of the Kane Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Myca Products Division of the Kane Company, 352 F.2d 511, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3980 (6th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question here involves the validity of a representation election conducted by the Board, which was won by the union. A change in only three votes would have resulted in the union losing the election.

Following certification of the election by the Board, MYCA refused to bargain with the union in order that it might litigate the validity of the election. This resulted in charges of unfair labor practices being filed by the union against MYCA. The Board upheld the election and found that MYCA violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act 1 by refusing to bargain with the union. It issued an order requiring MYCA to bargain with the union and to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices.

MYCA contested the validity of the election on the ground that certain employees supporting the union made threats against other employees who were not in favor of the union. MYCA claimed that this created an atmosphere of fear which was not conducive to the conducting of a fair election.

The Board considered all of the evidence carefully, some of which was hearsay. There was no evidence that any threats were inspired by the union.

We agree with the Board that the conduct complained of, in which neither the union nor MYCA participated, did not warrant setting aside the election. Considering the record as a whole, the Board's order was supported by substantial evidence.

In our judgment the order was not too broad.

Enforcement decreed.

1

. 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 F.2d 511, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-myca-products-division-of-the-kane-ca6-1965.