National Labor Relations Board v. Morristown Knitting Mills

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Morristown Knitting Mills

179 F.2d 242, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3486

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 9, 1949

Docket10986_1

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.2d 242 (National Labor Relations Board v. Morristown Knitting Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Morristown Knitting Mills, 179 F.2d 242, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3486 (6th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion of respondent, Morristown Knitting Mills, concurred in by the petitioner,

It is ordered that this case be and the same is hereby remanded to the National Labor Relations Board to permit the Board to take evidence concerning the matters raised in respondent’s motion, and to reopen the entire record in so far as it pertains to the alleged discriminatory discharge of Beulah Mae Mayes to determine, in the light of all the evidence heretofore taken and to be taken, including evidence as to events occurring since the hearing before the trial examiner, what modification, if any, should be made in the Board’s order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion of respondent, Morristown Knitting Mills, concurred in by the petitioner,

It is ordered that this case be and the same is hereby remanded to the National Labor Relations Board to permit the Board to take evidence concerning the matters raised in respondent’s motion, and to reopen the entire record in so far as it pertains to the alleged discriminatory discharge of Beulah Mae Mayes to determine, in the light of all the evidence heretofore taken and to be taken, including evidence as to events occurring since the hearing before the trial examiner, what modification, if any, should be made in the Board’s order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 F.2d 242, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2529, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-morristown-knitting-mills-ca6-1949.