National Labor Relations Board v. Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc.

433 F.2d 1309, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6069

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1970

Docket20330

StatusPublished

This text of 433 F.2d 1309 (National Labor Relations Board v. Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Midway Clover Farm Market, Inc., 433 F.2d 1309, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6069 (6th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the court upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order reported at 175 N.L.R.B. No. 151. Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board for a recitation of the facts.

This court holds that the part of the order requiring reinstatement of Stewart Prindle with backpay is not supported by substantial evidence on the record when considered as a whole, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial examiner and the dissenting opinion of Chairman McCulloch.

It is ordered that enforcement is denied as to that part of the Board’s order requiring the reinstatement of Stewart Prindle with backpay. It is further ordered that in all other respects enforcement is granted.

Judge McCree would enforce the order of the Board in its entirety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before the court upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order reported at 175 N.L.R.B. No. 151. Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board for a recitation of the facts.

This court holds that the part of the order requiring reinstatement of Stewart Prindle with backpay is not supported by substantial evidence on the record when considered as a whole, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial examiner and the dissenting opinion of Chairman McCulloch.

It is ordered that enforcement is denied as to that part of the Board’s order requiring the reinstatement of Stewart Prindle with backpay. It is further ordered that in all other respects enforcement is granted.

Judge McCree would enforce the order of the Board in its entirety.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 F.2d 1309, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-midway-clover-farm-market-inc-ca6-1970.