National Labor Relations Board v. Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc.

First Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc.

226 F.2d 218, 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2713, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1955

Docket4981_1

StatusPublished

This text of 226 F.2d 218 (National Labor Relations Board v. Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc., 226 F.2d 218, 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2713, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575 (1st Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for a decree enforcing a Board order against Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc. No appearance has been filed in this court on behalf of respondent. Respondent has filed no brief in opposition to the petition, though such *219 brief was due to be filed on August 8, 1955, nor has any extension of time been applied for. Under the circumstances, pursuant to an unopposed motion by the Board, we entered an order on September 12, 1955, to the effect that the case be submitted to the court forthwith upon petitioner’s brief and record appendix thereto.

From an examination of the record appendix, we are satisfied that the Board had jurisdiction of the administrative proceeding before it; that the Board’s findings of fact as to the commission of certain unfair labor practices are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; and that the Board’s remedial order is appropriate and within its discretion, being in routine terms as applicable to the type of unfair labor practices here involved.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for a decree enforcing a Board order against Maurice Embroidery Works, Inc. No appearance has been filed in this court on behalf of respondent. Respondent has filed no brief in opposition to the petition, though such *219 brief was due to be filed on August 8, 1955, nor has any extension of time been applied for. Under the circumstances, pursuant to an unopposed motion by the Board, we entered an order on September 12, 1955, to the effect that the case be submitted to the court forthwith upon petitioner’s brief and record appendix thereto.

From an examination of the record appendix, we are satisfied that the Board had jurisdiction of the administrative proceeding before it; that the Board’s findings of fact as to the commission of certain unfair labor practices are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; and that the Board’s remedial order is appropriate and within its discretion, being in routine terms as applicable to the type of unfair labor practices here involved.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 F.2d 218, 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2713, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-maurice-embroidery-works-inc-ca1-1955.