National Labor Relations Board v. Marquette Metal Products Co.
This text of 152 F.2d 964 (National Labor Relations Board v. Marquette Metal Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;
And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that the respondent engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, Title 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.; and it appearing that the conduct of respondent’s supervisory employees constituted interference, restraint and coercion in violation of the Act; H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514, 518, 519, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309; National Labor Relations Board v. M. A. Hanna Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 786, 788: It is ordered that a decree issue enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board as prayed in the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 F.2d 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-marquette-metal-products-co-ca6-1946.