National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 522

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 522

281 F.2d 952, 46 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3696

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1960

Docket13233

StatusPublished

This text of 281 F.2d 952 (National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 522) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 522, 281 F.2d 952, 46 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3696 (3d Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

281 F.2d 952

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner
v.
LOCAL UNION 522, LUMBER DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HANDLERS,
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,
CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF
AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 13233.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 14, 1960.
Decided Sept. 23, 1960.

On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on petition for enforcement of an order made by the Board against the respondent labor organization, 126 NLRB No. 41. The case presented is one under Section 8(b)(4)(A) and (B). 29 U.S.C.A. 158(b)(4)(A) and (B)(1956). The factual pattern of the case is very much like that outlined in our decision in N.L.R.B. v. Brewery and Beer Distributor Drivers, etc., 3 Cir., 281 F.2d 319. In this instance, however, the facts proved against the union are even stronger than in that case. The decree is in proper form and an order for enforcement will be issued upon presentation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

281 F.2d 952

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner
v.
LOCAL UNION 522, LUMBER DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HANDLERS,
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,
CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF
AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 13233.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 14, 1960.
Decided Sept. 23, 1960.

On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on petition for enforcement of an order made by the Board against the respondent labor organization, 126 NLRB No. 41. The case presented is one under Section 8(b)(4)(A) and (B). 29 U.S.C.A. 158(b)(4)(A) and (B)(1956). The factual pattern of the case is very much like that outlined in our decision in N.L.R.B. v. Brewery and Beer Distributor Drivers, etc., 3 Cir., 281 F.2d 319. In this instance, however, the facts proved against the union are even stronger than in that case. The decree is in proper form and an order for enforcement will be issued upon presentation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 F.2d 952, 46 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-local-union-522-ca3-1960.