National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 136

404 F.2d 854
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 20, 1968·No. 18539_1·Published

Opinion

404 F.2d 854

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LOCAL UNION 136, MUSKINGUM VALLEY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, and its Agent, Harold Jackson, Respondents.

No. 18539.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 20, 1968.

Lawrence J. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Lawrence J. Sherman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief.

Robert I. Doggett, of Smith, Latimer & Doggett, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondents.

Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause is before the Court upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order finding that the respondents violated Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (1) (A)), and Section 8(b) (2) and (1) (A) of the Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 158(b) (2), 158 (b) (1) (A)), and the cause having come on to be heard upon the record and the brief and arguments of counsel, upon due consideration the Court is of the view that there is not substantial evidence upon the record, viewed as a whole, to support the findings and order of the Board. Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for enforcement of said order of the National Labor Relations Board (165 NLRB No. 139) be and it is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 136, 404 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1968).

404 F.2d 854 (National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 136) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related