National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 806, Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Clc
This text of 974 F.2d 1343 (National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 806, Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Clc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
974 F.2d 1343
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LOCAL NO. 806, LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH
AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC, Respondent.
No. 91-70404.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 18, 1992.
Decided Sept. 2, 1992.
On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, NLRB No. 21-CB-8978.
NLRB
ORDER ENFORCED.
Before TANG, and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and WALKER,* District Judge.
ORDER**
The Order of the Board is hereby enforced. Substantial evidence exists to support the finding that the Union's coercive conduct was motivated primarily by the dissident members' protected concerted activities, rather than by personal animosity. Teamsters Local No. 729, 189 N.L.R.B. 1056, 1057 (1983). We find upon review that there is also substantial evidence to support the ALJ's several findings of violation of section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A). See Carpenters Union Local No. 205 v. N.L.R.B., 915 F.2d 490, 494 (9th Cir.1990).
The order is ENFORCED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 F.2d 1343, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-local-no-806-laborers-international-ca9-1992.