National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291
This text of 375 F.2d 1011 (National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
375 F.2d 1011
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and United
Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor,
v.
LOCAL 1291, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION,
AFL-CIO, Respondent.
No. 16186.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued April 3, 1967.
Decided April 28, 1967, Rehearing Denied May 18, 1967.
Leon M. Kestenbaum, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.
Martin J. Vigderman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent.
Before McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, District judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
In this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, the sole question is whether the employees represented by the intervenor union or those represented by respondent union should do the disputed work. This is a problem peculiarly for the expertise of the Board. We are satisfied that the latter in arriving at its determination carefully considered all relevant factors and that its decision is entirely proper under the law.
The order of the Board will be enforced in full. Proposed decree will be submitted by the Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 F.2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-local-1291-ca3-1967.