National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.
This text of 405 F.2d 494 (National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The NLRB seeks enforcement of its order entered respecting respondent as reported at 161 N.L.R.B. No. 138.
While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s finding that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3) and (1), by diseriminatorily discharging employee Beverly Marsh to discourage union membership and activity.
Accordingly the Board’s order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 F.2d 494, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2935, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-levinsons-owl-rexall-drugs-inc-ca9-1968.