National Labor Relations Board v. Lardner Elevator Company

474 F.2d 1396, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 1973
Docket72-2005
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F.2d 1396 (National Labor Relations Board v. Lardner Elevator Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Lardner Elevator Company, 474 F.2d 1396, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11326 (6th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

ORDER.

This case came on to be heard before a panel appointed pursuant to Rule 3(e) of this Court. 1

*1397 The case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order, issued June 26, 1972, against the respondent company. Reference is made to the Board’s decision and order, reported at 197 NLRB No. 145, for a detailed recitation of the facts.

The Court concludes that it is manifest that the questions on which the decision of the Court depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument within the contemplation of Rule 8 of the rules of this Court.

We find that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

It is ordered that enforcement be granted.

1

. “(e) Docket Control. In the interest of docket control, the chief judge may from time to time, in his discretion, appoint a panel or panels to review pending cases for appropriate assignment or disposition under Rules 7(e), 8 or 9 or any other rule of this court.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F.2d 1396, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-lardner-elevator-company-ca6-1973.