National Labor Relations Board v. Kelco Corp.

193 F.2d 642, 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1952
Docket5985_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 F.2d 642 (National Labor Relations Board v. Kelco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Kelco Corp., 193 F.2d 642, 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535 (4th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board directing the Kelco Corporation to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to restore with back pay employees found to have been discriminatorily discharged. The case was before us in 1949, when we remanded it to the Board for the purpose of taking additional evidence with respect to the discharge of certain of the employees. See 4 Cir., 178 F.2d 578. On the remand, an agreement was reached as to the reinstatement and back pay of all the employees named in the order except five, and reinstatement was denied by the Board to three of these. The reinstatement and back pay provisions of the order were thereupon amended to eliminate therefrom the names of all employees except two, Ruth and Popiolek; and member Reynolds thought that they also should have been eliminated. At the bar of this court counsel for the Board consented to the elimination of Ruth; and', upon consideration of the record, we think that Popiolek should be eliminated. He was unquestionably engaged in acts of intimidation of such character that his reemployment should not have been ordered.

The order of the Board will be modified by eliminating therefrom sections 2 (a) and 2 (b) relating to reinstatement and back pay; and, as so modified, the order of the Board will be enforced.

Modified and enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 F.2d 642, 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-kelco-corp-ca4-1952.