National Labor Relations Board v. Kartarik, Inc

Eighth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Kartarik, Inc

209 F.2d 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1954

Docket14958_1

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 956 (National Labor Relations Board v. Kartarik, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Kartarik, Inc, 209 F.2d 956 (8th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

209 F.2d 956

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
KARTARIK, Inc.

No. 14958.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

January 20, 1954.

Petition for enforcement of order of National Labor Relations Board.

David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Felhaber & Larson, St. Paul, Minn., for respondent.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

209 F.2d 956

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
KARTARIK, Inc.

No. 14958.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

January 20, 1954.

Petition for enforcement of order of National Labor Relations Board.

David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Felhaber & Larson, St. Paul, Minn., for respondent.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on petition for enforcement and consent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-kartarik-inc-ca8-1954.