National Labor Relations Board v. John Morrell and Company

770 F.2d 1400, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2342, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22801
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1985·No. 84-5760·Published

Opinion

770 F.2d 1400

120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2342, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,566

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
JOHN MORRELL AND COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 84-5760.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Argued July 31, 1985.
Decided Sept. 9, 1985.

ON PETITION to Enforce an Order from The National Labor Relations board.

Elliott Moore, Charles Donnelly, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Gerald P. Fleischut, Director, Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.

James V. Coggin, argued, Weintraub, DeHart, Robinson, Coggin & Trotter, James H. Stock, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record herein and after oral argument, the Order of the National Labor Relations Board is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the entered opinion of the National Labor Relations Board, 270 N.L.R.B. No. 1 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. John Morrell and Company, 770 F.2d 1400, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2342, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22801 (6th Cir. 1985).

770 F.2d 1400 (National Labor Relations Board v. John Morrell and Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Smith
687 S.W.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1985)