National Labor Relations Board v. Isaac and Vinson Security Services, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Isaac and Vinson Security Services, Inc.

467 F.2d 213

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1972

Docket72-1358

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 F.2d 213 (National Labor Relations Board v. Isaac and Vinson Security Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Isaac and Vinson Security Services, Inc., 467 F.2d 213 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Isaac & Vinson Security Services, Inc., cease and desist from violating Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), 158(a)(3), and that it reinstate with backpay the employees discharged in violation of these Sections. 193 NLRB No. 129. The respondent challenges only the substantiality of the evidence in support of the Board’s order.

The Board’s findings will be set aside only “when the record before a Court of Appeals clearly precludes the Board’s decision from being justified by a fair estimate of the worth of the testimony of the witnesses or its informed judgment on matters within its special competence.” Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 490, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456; N. L. R. B. v. Georgia Rug Mill, 5 Cir. 1962, 308 F.2d 89. After an examination of the record in this case, we are convinced that the Board’s findings are fully supported by the evidence considered as a whole. N. *214 L. R. B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co., 5 Cir. 1960, 300 F.2d 273; N. L. R. B. v. Allure Shoe Corp., 5 Cir. 1960, 277 F.2d 231; N. L. R. B. v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp., 5 Cir. 1960, 273 F.2d 660.

Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Isaac & Vinson Security Services, Inc., cease and desist from violating Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), 158(a)(3), and that it reinstate with backpay the employees discharged in violation of these Sections. 193 NLRB No. 129. The respondent challenges only the substantiality of the evidence in support of the Board’s order.

The Board’s findings will be set aside only “when the record before a Court of Appeals clearly precludes the Board’s decision from being justified by a fair estimate of the worth of the testimony of the witnesses or its informed judgment on matters within its special competence.” Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 490, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456; N. L. R. B. v. Georgia Rug Mill, 5 Cir. 1962, 308 F.2d 89. After an examination of the record in this case, we are convinced that the Board’s findings are fully supported by the evidence considered as a whole. N. *214 L. R. B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co., 5 Cir. 1960, 300 F.2d 273; N. L. R. B. v. Allure Shoe Corp., 5 Cir. 1960, 277 F.2d 231; N. L. R. B. v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp., 5 Cir. 1960, 273 F.2d 660.

Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 F.2d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-isaac-and-vinson-security-services-inc-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack