National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc.

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc.

343 F.2d 759, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2816, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5998

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 6, 1965·No. 15089_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From substantial evidence on the whole case the Board here found that the Respondent by unilaterally changing working conditions relating to pay for double shifts and sales quotas without notice to or consultation with its employees’ lawfully designated bargaining representative and by failing, within the meaning of Section 8(d) of the Act, to confer in good faith with respect to the negotiation of an agreement, had engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act.

The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order will be granted. The Board will present a proposed decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From substantial evidence on the whole case the Board here found that the Respondent by unilaterally changing working conditions relating to pay for double shifts and sales quotas without notice to or consultation with its employees’ lawfully designated bargaining representative and by failing, within the meaning of Section 8(d) of the Act, to confer in good faith with respect to the negotiation of an agreement, had engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act.

The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order will be granted. The Board will present a proposed decree.

National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc., 343 F.2d 759, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2816, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5998 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

343 F.2d 759 (National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related