National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc.
This text of 343 F.2d 759 (National Labor Relations Board v. Irvington Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From substantial evidence on the whole case the Board here found that the Respondent by unilaterally changing working conditions relating to pay for double shifts and sales quotas without notice to or consultation with its employees’ lawfully designated bargaining representative and by failing, within the meaning of Section 8(d) of the Act, to confer in good faith with respect to the negotiation of an agreement, had engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act.
The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order will be granted. The Board will present a proposed decree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 F.2d 759, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2816, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-irvington-motors-inc-ca3-1965.