National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8, Waterway Terminals Company, Intervenor

473 F.2d 15, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11958
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 1973
Docket71-2898
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 473 F.2d 15 (National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8, Waterway Terminals Company, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8, Waterway Terminals Company, Intervenor, 473 F.2d 15, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11958 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order finding that International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union Local No. 8 (Local 8) picketed the premises of Waterway Terminals Company (Waterway) with an object of securing recognition, in violation of § 8(b)(7)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board’s decision and order, requiring that Local 8 cease and desist from further picketing, are reported at 193 NLRB No. 65.' The underlying dispute between these parties has been before this court in another context. Waterway Terminals Co. v. N. L. É. B., 467 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1972).

The issue before the Board revolved around conflicting versions of what transpired at a meeting between representatives of Local 8 and Waterway on November 2, 1970. Local 8 excepted before the Board and now before us to the credibility resolutions made by the Trial Examiner. We do not disturb credibility resolutions “unless a clear preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces that they are incorrect.” N. L. R. B. v. Luisi Truck Lines, 384 F. 2d 842, 846 (9th Cir. 1967). We have carefully examined the record and have found no reason to reverse the credibility findings.

The petition for enforcement is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F.2d 15, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-international-longshoremens-and-ca9-1973.