National Labor Relations Board v. International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, Afl-Cio

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, Afl-Cio

355 F.2d 249, 61 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2246, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7485

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 19, 1966·No. 16294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29 U.S.C., Section 151, et seq.) the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its Order against respondent, International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, AFL-CIO, reported at 148 N.L.R.B. No. 10.

The Board found that the respondent Union violated Sections 8(b) (2) and 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining, pursuant to arrangements with employers, a hiring system under which preference in employment was given to members of the Union. The Board found that respondent unlawfully caused an employer not to rehire one William O. Strickland because he was not a member in good standing, although Strickland was entitled to such re-employment and that thereafter, when Strickland obtained employment with another employer, respondent unlawfully demanded and secured his discharge for the same reason.

From an examination of the entire record, we conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its Order is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29 U.S.C., Section 151, et seq.) the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its Order against respondent, International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, AFL-CIO, reported at 148 N.L.R.B. No. 10.

The Board found that the respondent Union violated Sections 8(b) (2) and 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining, pursuant to arrangements with employers, a hiring system under which preference in employment was given to members of the Union. The Board found that respondent unlawfully caused an employer not to rehire one William O. Strickland because he was not a member in good standing, although Strickland was entitled to such re-employment and that thereafter, when Strickland obtained employment with another employer, respondent unlawfully demanded and secured his discharge for the same reason.

From an examination of the entire record, we conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its Order is sustained.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, Afl-Cio, 355 F.2d 249, 61 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2246, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7485 (6th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

355 F.2d 249 (National Labor Relations Board v. International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, Local 894, Afl-Cio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.