National Labor Relations Board v. Great Falls White Truck Company

452 F.2d 608, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2026, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6697
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1971·No. 71-1667·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petition for enforcement is granted. The record discloses substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that the company’s discharge of employee Braden was motivated by the employer’s dislike of his union activities. Braden had testified against the company in several grievance hearings, and his manager considered him a troublemaker. The company claimed his work was faulty, but the Board found this to be a mere pretext. We will not disturb a Board finding of motive drawn from conflicting evidence unless a clear preponderance of evidence convinces that the Board’s conclusions are incorrect. NLRB v. Winkel Motors, 443 F.2d 38 (9th Cir. 1971); Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. NLRB, 416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Great Falls White Truck Company, 452 F.2d 608, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2026, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6697 (9th Cir. 1971).

452 F.2d 608 (National Labor Relations Board v. Great Falls White Truck Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related