National Labor Relations Board v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.

368 F.2d 1005, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 28, 1966

Docket23135

StatusPublished

This text of 368 F.2d 1005 (National Labor Relations Board v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., 368 F.2d 1005, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for the enforcement of its order based upon a finding that respondent, Glazer’s Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., violated Section 8(a) (1) by unlawful and coercive interrogation of its employees and Section 8(a) (3) by the discharge of two of its employees because of their union activities. National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. Secs. 158(a) (1) and (a) (3). We have carefully reviewed the record and find that although the evidence concerning the alleged violations is in sharp conflict, the trial examiner exercised a valid credibility choice. The examiner’s conclusions that respondent coercively interrogated its employees and that it was unlawfully motivated in the discharge of two of its employees, which conclusions were adopted by the Board, are amply supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The petition is granted and the Board’s order is

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for the enforcement of its order based upon a finding that respondent, Glazer’s Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., violated Section 8(a) (1) by unlawful and coercive interrogation of its employees and Section 8(a) (3) by the discharge of two of its employees because of their union activities. National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. Secs. 158(a) (1) and (a) (3). We have carefully reviewed the record and find that although the evidence concerning the alleged violations is in sharp conflict, the trial examiner exercised a valid credibility choice. The examiner’s conclusions that respondent coercively interrogated its employees and that it was unlawfully motivated in the discharge of two of its employees, which conclusions were adopted by the Board, are amply supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The petition is granted and the Board’s order is

Enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 F.2d 1005, 63 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-glazers-wholesale-drug-company-inc-ca5-1966.