National Labor Relations Board v. Getman

404 U.S. 1204, 92 S. Ct. 7, 30 L. Ed. 2d 8, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 3618, 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2100
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJuly 27, 1971
DocketNo. A-109
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 404 U.S. 1204 (National Labor Relations Board v. Getman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Getman, 404 U.S. 1204, 92 S. Ct. 7, 30 L. Ed. 2d 8, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 3618, 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2100 (1971).

Opinion

MR. Justice Black,

Acting Circuit Justice.

Respondents, two law professors who are undertaking a study of labor representation elections, applied for and obtained an order from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia requiring the National Labor Relations Board to provide respondents “with names and addresses of employees eligible to vote in approximately 35 elections to be designated by (respondents).” Respondents base their claim to the information on the language of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U. S. C. § 552 (a)(3), which requires that a Government agency “on request for identifiable records . . . shall make the records promptly available to any person.” The Government has filed an application seeking a stay of the order of the District Court. This application was assigned to me in the absence of The Chief Justice.

The Government applies for a stay on the ground that the District Court order requiring the Board to comply with the Freedom of Information Act and deliver the records in question to respondents would interfere with the representation election procedures under the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended. The Board was created by Congress and Congress has [1205]*1205seen fit to make identifiable records of the Board and other Government agencies available to any person upon proper request. I find no exception in the Freedom of Information Act which would authorize the Board to refuse promptly to turn over the requested records. I deny the application for stay without prejudice to the Government to present its application to another Member of this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierman v. Stryker Corporation
S.D. California, 2020
Cunningham v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
540 F. Supp. 1 (N.D. Ohio, 1981)
Lane County v. Walker
568 P.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
Fonda v. Central Intelligence Agency
434 F. Supp. 498 (District of Columbia, 1977)
Aug v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
425 F. Supp. 946 (District of Columbia, 1976)
Kreindler v. Department of the Navy of the United States
372 F. Supp. 333 (S.D. New York, 1974)
A. Kenneth Hawkes v. Internal Revenue Service
467 F.2d 787 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
Joan S. Mahan V
404 U.S. 1201 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
404 U.S. 1204, 92 S. Ct. 7, 30 L. Ed. 2d 8, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 3618, 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-getman-scotus-1971.