National Labor Relations Board v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Midwestern Division

306 F.2d 493
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 31, 1962
Docket17139
StatusPublished

This text of 306 F.2d 493 (National Labor Relations Board v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Midwestern Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Midwestern Division, 306 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

306 F.2d 493

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
FRITO-LAY, INC. MIDWESTERN DIVISION.

No. 17139.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

August 31, 1962.

Petition to enforce order of National Labor Relations Board.

Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L. R.B. and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., for petitioner.

John E. Tate, Omaha, Neb., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order of Labor Board enforced on petition for enforcement and stipulation for entry of consent decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 F.2d 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-frito-lay-inc-mid-ca8-1962.