National Labor Relations Board v. Everest & Jennings, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Everest & Jennings, Inc.

384 F.2d 999, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2032, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4466

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1967

Docket21746

StatusPublished

This text of 384 F.2d 999 (National Labor Relations Board v. Everest & Jennings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Everest & Jennings, Inc., 384 F.2d 999, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2032, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4466 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

384 F.2d 999

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant,
v.
EVEREST & JENNINGS, INC., Appellee.

No. 21746.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 21, 1967.

On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard Rodin (argued), Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Paul A. Cassady, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Lyman B. Powell (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board's findings and conclusions, and the Board's order is enforced in every particular.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI