National Labor Relations Board v. Estate of Nathan Gladstone, D/B/A Fassetts Bakery

Second Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Estate of Nathan Gladstone, D/B/A Fassetts Bakery

342 F.2d 755, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2640, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6176

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 18, 1965

Docket29334_1

StatusPublished

This text of 342 F.2d 755 (National Labor Relations Board v. Estate of Nathan Gladstone, D/B/A Fassetts Bakery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Estate of Nathan Gladstone, D/B/A Fassetts Bakery, 342 F.2d 755, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2640, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6176 (2d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

342 F.2d 755

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ESTATE of Nathan GLADSTONE, d/b/a Fassetts Bakery, Respondent.

No. 382, Docket 29334.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 17, 1965.
Decided March 18, 1965.

Michael N. Sohn, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davision, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Paul D. Sheehey, Burlington, Vt., for respondent.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We grant enforcement to the order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 147 N.L.R.B. No. 54 (1964). The Board's finding that the respondent violated 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(1) and (3), is supported by the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI