National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Shannon, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, Doing Business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company

237 F.2d 855, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2056, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4627

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1956·No. 13644·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, it is agreed by the parties that the respondents have to September 25, 1956 complied with our order of January 16, 1956, finding them in contempt for not complying with our decree of January 18, 1954, but providing that by compliance with the order they would be purged of contempt; and

Whereas, our decree of January 18, 1954 is a continuing order controlling the conduct of respondents in the future;

Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the respondents be deemed purged of the contempt for the particular violation found contemptuous by our order of January 16, 1956, 9 Cir., 229 F.2d 652.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, our decree of January 18, 1954 is a continuing order controlling the conduct of respondents in the future;

Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the respondents be deemed purged of the contempt for the particular violation found contemptuous by our order of January 16, 1956, 9 Cir., 229 F.2d 652.

National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Shannon, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, Doing Business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company, 237 F.2d 855, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2056, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4627 (9th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

237 F.2d 855 (National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Shannon, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, Doing Business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Robert Blood v. The City of New York and S. A. Healy Company

237 F.2d 855 (Second Circuit, 1956)

Opinion

Related