National Labor Relations Board v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company

Fourth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company

394 F.2d 1, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7346

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1968·No. 11999·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s findings that the employer violated § 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act by interrogating employees and creating an impression of surveillance and § 8(a) (3) by discriminatorily laying off a union adherent. We therefore enforce in its entirety the Board’s order which enjoin *2 ed further conduct of this character and required the employer to compensate the employee for earnings lost from the time of the layoff until her reinstatement.

Enforcement granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s findings that the employer violated § 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act by interrogating employees and creating an impression of surveillance and § 8(a) (3) by discriminatorily laying off a union adherent. We therefore enforce in its entirety the Board’s order which enjoin *2 ed further conduct of this character and required the employer to compensate the employee for earnings lost from the time of the layoff until her reinstatement.

Enforcement granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company, 394 F.2d 1, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7346 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

394 F.2d 1 (National Labor Relations Board v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.