National Labor Relations Board v. East Wind Enterprises

664 F.2d 754, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15497
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 1981
Docket81-7137
StatusPublished

This text of 664 F.2d 754 (National Labor Relations Board v. East Wind Enterprises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. East Wind Enterprises, 664 F.2d 754, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15497 (9th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

There is solid, substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination that the employee was discharged for union activities. The petitioner was able to make no plausible argument to the contrary.

The Board requests that in this case we grant an award of attorney’s fees against the petitioner for having taken a frivolous appeal to delay enforcement. As indicated, it is difficult to find any merit at all to the appeal, and we think the Board acted properly in requesting us to consider an award of attorney’s fees. We decline to award them in this case, however, because it has not been the practice to do so in this circuit, but henceforth we will be more favorably disposed to such requests in order to preserve the rights of all parties under the National Labor Relations Act and to protect our own docket.

“ENFORCED”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Albert James Goodheim
664 F.2d 754 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 F.2d 754, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-east-wind-enterprises-ca9-1981.