National Labor Relations Board v. Donna Lee Sportswear

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Donna Lee Sportswear

435 F.2d 559, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12309

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 1971

Docket18877_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 F.2d 559 (National Labor Relations Board v. Donna Lee Sportswear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Donna Lee Sportswear, 435 F.2d 559, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12309 (3d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an application by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to § 10 (e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), for enforcement of an order requiring Donna Lee Sportswear to pay back wages to one of its employees.

The single question raised in this application is whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the conclusion of the trial examiner, which was adopted by the National Labor Relations Board, that a strike by the employees of Donna Lee Sportswear was motivated by an unfair labor practice committed by the Company. We have examined the record in light of Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); see e. g., N. L. R. B. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., 429 F.2d 1223, 1231-1232 *560 (3rd Cir. 1970); N. L. R. B. v. Princeton Inn Co., 424 F.2d 264 (3rd Cir. 1970); Philadelphia Marine Trade Association v. N. L. R. B., 330 F.2d 492, 495 (3rd Cir. 1964); N. L. R.. B. v. Buitoni Foods Corp., 298 F.2d 169, 171 (3rd Cir. 1962), and we find that the Board’s conclusion is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Accordingly, the order of the National Labor Relations Board will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an application by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to § 10 (e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), for enforcement of an order requiring Donna Lee Sportswear to pay back wages to one of its employees.

The single question raised in this application is whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the conclusion of the trial examiner, which was adopted by the National Labor Relations Board, that a strike by the employees of Donna Lee Sportswear was motivated by an unfair labor practice committed by the Company. We have examined the record in light of Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); see e. g., N. L. R. B. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., 429 F.2d 1223, 1231-1232 *560 (3rd Cir. 1970); N. L. R. B. v. Princeton Inn Co., 424 F.2d 264 (3rd Cir. 1970); Philadelphia Marine Trade Association v. N. L. R. B., 330 F.2d 492, 495 (3rd Cir. 1964); N. L. R.. B. v. Buitoni Foods Corp., 298 F.2d 169, 171 (3rd Cir. 1962), and we find that the Board’s conclusion is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Accordingly, the order of the National Labor Relations Board will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 F.2d 559, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-donna-lee-sportswear-ca3-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack