National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc.

Third Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc.

316 F.2d 231, 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2029, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 23, 1963·No. 14115·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Board, in our opinion, was correct in holding that Delsea Iron Works, Inc., the respondent, violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, by discharging and later refusing to reinstate the thirteen strikers and that the walkout constituted protected concerted activity within the meaning of the Act. Indeed, the evidence admits of no other conclusion. We find the determination of the Board to be correct in all respects and accordingly its order must be enforced. A decree in the usual form may be submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Board, in our opinion, was correct in holding that Delsea Iron Works, Inc., the respondent, violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, by discharging and later refusing to reinstate the thirteen strikers and that the walkout constituted protected concerted activity within the meaning of the Act. Indeed, the evidence admits of no other conclusion. We find the determination of the Board to be correct in all respects and accordingly its order must be enforced. A decree in the usual form may be submitted.

National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc., 316 F.2d 231, 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2029, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

316 F.2d 231 (National Labor Relations Board v. Delsea Iron Works, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related