National Labor Relations Board v. Daylight Grocery Company

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Daylight Grocery Company

345 F.2d 239

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 10, 1965

Docket22059_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 239 (National Labor Relations Board v. Daylight Grocery Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Daylight Grocery Company, 345 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

*240 PER CURIAM:

The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1) of the-Act through coercive interrogation, threats of reprisal and offers of benefits; § 8(a)(2) through support of an employee’s committee; 8 (a) (3) by reason of discriminatory discharges and transfers; and § 8(a) (5) by refusing to bargain. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 158(a)(1), (2), (3), and (5). The order of the Board is amply supported in fact and in law. It follows that it will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*240 PER CURIAM:

The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1) of the-Act through coercive interrogation, threats of reprisal and offers of benefits; § 8(a)(2) through support of an employee’s committee; 8 (a) (3) by reason of discriminatory discharges and transfers; and § 8(a) (5) by refusing to bargain. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 158(a)(1), (2), (3), and (5). The order of the Board is amply supported in fact and in law. It follows that it will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 F.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-daylight-grocery-company-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack