National Labor Relations Board v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Company, Inc.
This text of 185 F.2d 1020 (National Labor Relations Board v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
185 F.2d 1020
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
DANIEL HAMM DRAYAGE COMPANY, Inc., Respondent.
No. 13186.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
January 22, 1951.
Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D. C.
Clarence D. Musser, Atty., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
John A. Caddell, Decatur, Ala., for respondent.
John D. Higgins, Birmingham, Ala., amicus curiae, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America.
Before HOLMES, BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It is considered by the Court, and so ordered, that the petition to enforce the order of the Board be, and the same hereby is, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.2d 1020, 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-daniel-hamm-draya-ca5-1951.