National Labor Relations Board v. Dal-Tex Optical Company, Inc.
This text of 325 F.2d 78 (National Labor Relations Board v. Dal-Tex Optical Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful scrutiny of the record in this case, especially the report of the trial examiner who recommended dismissal of the proceedings, convinces us that there is a lack of substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s order. The examiner made credibility determinations as to both the surveillance charge and the discriminatory discharges charge. We conclude that they should have been followed by the Board in the absence of any substantial countervailing evidence.
The petition to enforce is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F.2d 78, 54 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2671, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-dal-tex-optical-company-inc-ca5-1963.