National Labor Relations Board v. Cutler

First Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Cutler

158 F.2d 677, 19 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2160

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 3, 1947·No. No. 4204·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the respondents in this case urged no objections at any stage of the proceedings before the Board, and since no “extraordinary circumstances” are suggested to excuse their failure or neglect to do so, they cannot now object to a decree enforcing the Board’s order. See § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 454, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e); National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388, 389, 66 S.Ct. 553, and eases cited. Moreover an examination of the record discloses that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Since the respondents in this case urged no objections at any stage of the proceedings before the Board, and since no “extraordinary circumstances” are suggested to excuse their failure or neglect to do so, they cannot now object to a decree enforcing the Board’s order. See § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 454, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e); National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388, 389, 66 S.Ct. 553, and eases cited. Moreover an examination of the record discloses that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cutler, 158 F.2d 677, 19 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2160 (1st Cir. 1947).

Pincite

158 F.2d 677 (National Labor Relations Board v. Cutler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related