National Labor Relations Board v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates

767 F.2d 1276, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2539, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20804
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 1985
Docket85-1265
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 767 F.2d 1276 (National Labor Relations Board v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates, 767 F.2d 1276, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2539, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20804 (8th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondents C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates contest the Board’s order awarding back pay to Bruce F. Pine and Robert Becker. 1 The order awarded back pay to Pine for the period from September 11, 1979, to June 26, 1982, and stated that he was entitled to $17,462 with interest. Becker’s back pay award was $18,438 with interest, and it covered the period from September 11, 1979, to June 30,1982. Respondents argue in this appeal that Pine and Becker are not entitled to back pay past the Spring of 1980. They say that starting in the Spring of 1980, they switched from tandem trucks' to triaxle vehicles, and that tri-axles require driving experience that neither Becker nor Pine had.

The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ALJ’s recommended order. The AU found that driving a tri-axle vehicle is more difficult and more demanding than driving a tandem truck. The employer’s burden, however, is to show that Pine and Becker would have been discharged when the company converted exclusively to tri-axles. See NLRB v. Midwest Hanger Co., 550 F.2d 1101, 1104-05 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830, 98 S.Ct. 112, 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977). The ALJ concluded that Adams and Cates had not met their burden, and substantial evidence supports his decision. The Board’s order is enforced.

1

. The Board’s order was entered on remand from our decision in NLRB v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., 718 F.2d 869 (8th Cir.1983), holding that respondents had unlawfully discharged Pine and Becker. The Board’s order is reported at 272 NLRB No. 200 (November 27, 1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 F.2d 1276, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2539, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-cr-adams-trucking-inc-and-michael-ca8-1985.