National Labor Relations Board v. Cordele Manufacturing Co.
This text of 172 F.2d 225 (National Labor Relations Board v. Cordele Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court has considered the petitioner’s motion for judgment and respondent’s motion to dismiss. It is the opinion of the court that respondent’s motion to dismiss presents matters not properly cognizable at this time, but, if at all, only upon subsequent proceedings in connection with the enforcement of the decree.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss is therefore denied, and petitioner’s motion for judgment is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 F.2d 225, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2381, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-cordele-manufacturing-co-ca5-1949.