National Labor Relations Board v. Cordele Manufacturing Co.
172 F.2d 225, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2381, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3489
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 1949·No. No. 12634·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The court has considered the petitioner’s motion for judgment and respondent’s motion to dismiss. It is the opinion of the court that respondent’s motion to dismiss presents matters not properly cognizable at this time, but, if at all, only upon subsequent proceedings in connection with the enforcement of the decree.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss is therefore denied, and petitioner’s motion for judgment is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Labor Relations Board v. Cordele Manufacturing Co., 172 F.2d 225, 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2381, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3489 (5th Cir. 1949).
172 F.2d 225 (National Labor Relations Board v. Cordele Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Labor Relations Board v. Highview, Incorporated
590 F.2d 174 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)