National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills Corp.

Fourth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills Corp.

419 F.2d 394

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 1, 1969

DocketNos. 12788, 12789

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 F.2d 394 (National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills Corp., 419 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court granted the Board’s application for enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum directed to the company to require it to furnish a list of the names and addresses of all employees eligible to vote in a representation election ordered to be held by the [395]*395Board. Admittedly the list would be made available to the union seeking certification in accordance with the election rule announced in Excelsior Underwear, Inc., 156 NLRB 1236 (1966).

We find the asserted grounds of appeal lacking in merit. We affirm on the authority of NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759, 89 S.Ct. 1426, 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969), and NLRB v. J. P. Stevens & Co., 409 F.2d 1207 (4 Cir. 1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court granted the Board’s application for enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum directed to the company to require it to furnish a list of the names and addresses of all employees eligible to vote in a representation election ordered to be held by the [395]*395Board. Admittedly the list would be made available to the union seeking certification in accordance with the election rule announced in Excelsior Underwear, Inc., 156 NLRB 1236 (1966).

We find the asserted grounds of appeal lacking in merit. We affirm on the authority of NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759, 89 S.Ct. 1426, 22 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969), and NLRB v. J. P. Stevens & Co., 409 F.2d 1207 (4 Cir. 1969).

Affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills Corporation, Union Bleachery Division, National Labor Relations Board v. James G. Brennan, Olin Mann, Bruce Bayne, Bruce Turner, Marguerite Cantrell, Robert Martin, Jr., and Thomas Henry McBee Each as Employees of Cone Millscorporation, Union Bleachery Division, for Themselves and All Others Similarlysituated,appellants

419 F.2d 394 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-cone-mills-corp-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack