National Labor Relations Board v. Concrete Haulers, Inc., and Wamix, Inc.

215 F.2d 959
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1954
Docket14824
StatusPublished

This text of 215 F.2d 959 (National Labor Relations Board v. Concrete Haulers, Inc., and Wamix, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Concrete Haulers, Inc., and Wamix, Inc., 215 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

215 F.2d 959

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
CONCRETE HAULERS, Inc., and Wamix, Inc., Respondents.

No. 14824.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 16, 1954.

Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board sitting at Washington, D. C.

On Motion of Respondents to Modify Injunctive Decree.

A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen., Counsel, N. L. R. B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, John Francis Lawless, Attorneys, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Stanley E. Neely, Eugene M. Locke and Locke, Locke & Purnell, Dallas, Tex., for respondents.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the motion of respondents to modify the injunctive decree heretofore entered by this court be, and the same hereby is, denied, 212 F.2d 477.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-concrete-haulers-inc-and-wamix-inc-ca5-1954.