National Labor Relations Board v. Clinton Packing Company, Inc., and Clarence Turner, Additional in Contempt

525 F.2d 1365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1975
Docket72-1084 and 20341
StatusPublished

This text of 525 F.2d 1365 (National Labor Relations Board v. Clinton Packing Company, Inc., and Clarence Turner, Additional in Contempt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Clinton Packing Company, Inc., and Clarence Turner, Additional in Contempt, 525 F.2d 1365 (8th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came on to be heard the 9th day of December, 1975,. upon the petition and amended petition of the National Labor Relations Board for adjudication of the respondents in civil contempt, the answer thereto, the various other pleadings filed by the parties, the report of the Special Master, the transcript, the depositions, the briefs and oral arguments. Upon consideration of the foregoing the court hereby adopts the findings and recommendations of the Special Master with the following additional directions:

A. The prospective fines of William Contris and Clarence Turner shall be paid in the event of any further act of contempt of either of said respondents, similar in nature to those acts here found to be contemptuous, and committed in the operation of the Clinton Packing Company or any other business similar in nature to that conducted by the Clinton Packing Company from 1972-1974.
B. The prospective fines shall be as follows:
William Contris $10,000.00
Clarence Turner $5,000.00

Counsel for the National Labor Relations Board, in cooperation with counsel for respondents, is hereby directed to prepare and submit to the court within ten days for its signature the final adjudication of contempt, which document shall be in conformity with the recommendations of the Special Master as more specifically hereinbefore set forth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 F.2d 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-clinton-packing-company-inc-and-ca8-1975.