National Labor Relations Board v. Budrovich Contracting Co.

20 F. App'x 596
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2001·No. 00-3910·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions to enforce its order finding that Budrovich Contracting Company and Bu-drovich Excavating Company violated 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and § 158(a)(3) in a number of ways, most notably by laying off and discharging two union employees for demanding rights secured to them by a collective bargaining agreement, and by coercively interrogating another union employee.

We detect no error in the Board’s appreciation or application of the law, and its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record, that is, “ ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Carleton College v. NLRB, 230 F.3d 1075, 1077 (8th Cir.2000), quoting Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). We therefore grant the Board’s petition and enforce its order in its entirety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Budrovich Contracting Co., 20 F. App'x 596 (8th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 596 (National Labor Relations Board v. Budrovich Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Berryhill
N.D. California, 2020