National Labor Relations Board v. Boise Implement Company

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Boise Implement Company

215 F.2d 652

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 22, 1954·No. 14154_1·Published

Opinion

215 F.2d 652

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant,
v.
BOISE IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 14154.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 22, 1954.

Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, John F. Lawless, Attys., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent.

Before HEALY, POPE and FEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its order is granted for the reasons given in the Board's decision and order, 106 N.L.R.B. No. 114.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

215 F.2d 652

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant,
v.
BOISE IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 14154.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 22, 1954.

Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, John F. Lawless, Attys., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent.

Before HEALY, POPE and FEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its order is granted for the reasons given in the Board's decision and order, 106 N.L.R.B. No. 114.

National Labor Relations Board v. Boise Implement Company, 215 F.2d 652 (9th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

215 F.2d 652 (National Labor Relations Board v. Boise Implement Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.