National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Ridge Shoe Company
This text of 422 F.2d 1331 (National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Ridge Shoe Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
422 F.2d 1331
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
BLUE RIDGE SHOE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 13777.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1970.
Decided April 13, 1970.
On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
John I. Taylor, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Eli Nash, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.
John J. Delaney, Jr., Boston, Mass. (Duane R. Batista, and Nutter, McClennen & Fish, Boston, Mass., W. P. Sandridge, Sr., and Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before BRYAN, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We think the facts found by the board are not unsupported by substantial evidence. To those findings the board applied correct principles of law.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
422 F.2d 1331, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2937, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-blue-ridge-shoe-c-ca4-1970.