National Labor Relations Board v. Berton Kirshner, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Berton Kirshner, Inc.

523 F.2d 1046

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 23, 1975·No. 74-2022·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) for enforcement of its order against respondent. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 209 N.L.R.B. No. 170.

A review of the entire record shows the employer Berton Kirshner, Inc. was in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act (29 U.S.C. § 158) in that it interfered with and coerced its employees in preventing a free and open union election.

The Board revised a portion of the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and findings. On April 4, 1974 its Decision, Order and Direction of Second Election was entered.

The Order will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) for enforcement of its order against respondent. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 209 N.L.R.B. No. 170.

A review of the entire record shows the employer Berton Kirshner, Inc. was in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act (29 U.S.C. § 158) in that it interfered with and coerced its employees in preventing a free and open union election.

The Board revised a portion of the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and findings. On April 4, 1974 its Decision, Order and Direction of Second Election was entered.

The Order will be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Berton Kirshner, Inc., 523 F.2d 1046 (9th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

523 F.2d 1046 (National Labor Relations Board v. Berton Kirshner, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related