National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Supply Company
This text of 384 F.2d 999 (National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Supply Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
384 F.2d 999
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
BALDWIN SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 11417.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 8, 1967.
Decided Nov. 13, 1967.
Abigail Cooley Baskir, Attorney, N.L.R.B., (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Michael N. Sohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner.
George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Asa Ambrister, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case comes to us as a challenge to the Board's determination of an appropriate unit. With respect to this issue, we cannot find that the Board exceeded its discretion. Its order is therefore
Enforced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 F.2d 999, 66 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2768, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-baldwin-supply-company-ca4-1967.